«前の日記(2009-08-04) 最新 次の日記(2009-08-16)» 編集

ポケットを空にして。

1985|10|
2004|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2005|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2006|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2007|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2008|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2009|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2010|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2011|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2012|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2013|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2014|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2100|01|

「人の心に残るというのが大事」と言う話。

何か連絡がある場合はメールでどうぞ(過去の日記へのツッコミは基本的にみていません)
プレゼントは随時受け付けております :-) ここ最近のツッコミ/トラックバックリスト。


2009-08-07 [長年日記]

Priority override request would be needed to use BTS in the future

ganneff asked developers to use BTS to request override changes, see hit post. Yeah, of course I'll do so.

The format for such bug reports against the ftp.debian.org
pseudopackage:
 
Subject: override: PACKAGE1:section/priority, [...], PACKAGEX:section/priority
 
Include the justification for the change in the body of the bug please.

But... why "extra" is default priority value of template? Most of the packages would be "optional" , so it is suitable for default, I think.